Thursday 14 May 2015

So Fayose Should Be In Prison!

In the recent expostulations between Ekiti State Governor, Mr Ayodele Fayose and his party leadership, he reiterated his earlier position on his party helmsmen at the national level to pursue the part of honour by following the examples of British Labour Party Leader, Mr Ed Miliband and his Liberal Democrats associate, Mr Nick Clegg who threw in the towel after the embarrassment of their party in the recent general election. He opined that the continuous staying in power of Alhaji Adamu Muazu, the chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) after the bewailing campaign that led to the loss of President Goodluck Jonathan and some state governors and lawmakers across the country could not have happened if Nigeria is a sane country. What an irony of life?
Quoting him, “Haven’t we now seen what operates in saner climes with the resignation of the British LP and Democrat leaders? Shouldn’t our party National Chairman also take a cue from this and allow for fresh minds to steer the ship of the party at this difficult time?” Of a truth, Gov. Fayose was right in the stepping aside call on his party leadership. Muazu and his colleagues at Wadata House led their party to one of the most awful election since the inception of the party in 1998. As noble as the call, piper like Mr Ayo Fayose should have considered it twice if he is fitted to blow the whistle. The man has forgotten history. Though his approval of his leadership by his citizenry is not in question, their supports in every election have proved that he is a man to beat in the Fountain of Knowledge.
It is truly sure that we need men and women of Gov. Fayose’s “saner” ideologies in our political system. He want resignation of key officers because of what he thought are the path of honour, unfortunately, he has forgotten that Nigeria is not yet a “sane” country. If Nigeria is a sane country, men like Gov. Peter Ayodele Fayose should not be occupying the type of position he is today. In a saner society, the governor should have been sent to political oblivion. The media in saner country would have tagged him “shamed” “disgraced” “rat” etc.
In September 2012, the British Parliament chief whip, Andrew Mitchell, was alleged to have used fowl language against some policemen on his way while riding his bicycle; he was accused of calling the cops “plebes”, the allegation he vehemently denied, on the third day, Mitchell stepped aside to allow independent investigators to have their way, later, he was fined and resigned as a parliament. Just last year, in the build up to the gubernatorial election in his state, there was allegation that Gov Fayose was led some political hoodlum to assault a judge within a court premises, the sanity of a country never cross his mind. He never thought of withdrawing from the race for proper investigations. Although it is an allegation, but such a glaring mere allegation in the said sane country is enough for withdrawal of an aspirant from any electoral contest.
The same year, after the election, an audio tape surfaced, where Gov. Fayose and some other prominent individuals within the ruling party were alleged to have perfected the rigging plan of the election to his favour using the available security apparatus. In a sane society such as Great Britain, a character like him will never smell public office again. There are allegations of murders, yet he was still able to ascend to the position of governor, that will never happen in sane society but in Nigeria. Why crucifying Muazu? For God’s sake, you would have considered issues before making some statements. I want a Nigeria where our own Ed Miliband will quickly throw in the towel but such crusade could have been led by different morally liberal personalities and not the like of Fayose of this world.
In Britain, corruption allegation is serious and no one treat it with kid gloves. That is a sane society. In Nigeria, corrupt people dominate and control the system. May be Gov. Fayose has forgotten, in 2012, several British MPs were alleged to have mistakenly or deliberately claimed few pounds in excess of their entitlement. They all faced the music squarely as they were forced to return the excess claimed expenses, some ended up in jail and others resigned their positions. That is a sane society. In a case before Justice Hobon Adamu, Gov. Fayose is still facing a 27-count charge of conversion of about N400 million public funds to private use. I recognise he is an innocent until otherwise proven by competent court of law but the morality demanded that he shouldn’t have ever contested at all, where is the sanity?
In 2008, Ian Oakley, 31, harassed Sal Brinton and Russell Wilson, the co-contestants in a council election, he called them child abuser and wrote some letter to them suggesting they are not fit to contest election against him. He was reported to the police, he later resigned as prospective parliamentary candidate for Watford. Governor Fayose should have resigned after the public outcry over his death wishes adverts of Gen. Mohammadu Buhari. What is the difference between Ian Oakley and Gov. Fayose? I wish the governor well in his voyage to see a new vibrant PDP but advocating a change using an instance of a sane country is pathetic. If Adamu Muazu must resign, then where should Governor Fayose be?


Jacob Ogunseye – JEDD Centre for Leadership and Direction (jeddcentreflandd@mail.com)

Activists Sue Patience Jonathan Over First Ladies’ Meeting


A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has been asked to restrain Dame Patience Jonathan from holding an emergency meeting of African First Ladies Peace Mission (AFLPM) in Abuja on May 15.
The court will hear the application to stop the meeting today.

The plaintiffs, who include Nana Module Onwodi, Ekemma Ugborough Arisa, Louisa Ono Eikhomun and Deborah Oboh, said the emergency meeting called by Dame Jonathan was called in “bad faith” as it is aimed at scuttling any chance of Aisha Buhari becoming the president of AFLPM.
Other defendants in the matter include Juliet Mene, Juliet Pearce, Sonia Adolf and Kate Duru.
The case could not go on yesterday when it was called because the procedure for proof of service had not been completed.
Accordingly, Justice Husseini Baba-Yusuf, adjourned the matter to enable Barrister Mohammed Ahmed file an affidavit of service and attach the Proof of Service to the said affidavit averring that the service had been effected on the defendant, Dame Jonathan.
“You should have filed an affidavit of service and annexed the Proof of Service. The document does not speak for itself. Normally, if it is service on a party directly, you file the copy endorsed by the recipient party. But if it’s service by substituted means, you file an affidavit to say pursuant to the order of substituted means, we have effected service. I will adjourn to tomorrow, May 14, to enable you file the affidavit of service. Your application will be taken tomorrow”, Justice Baba-Yusuf ruled.
The plaintiffs had filed a writ of summons for themselves and on behalf of Concerned Women for Peace and Development, seeking to stop the emergency meeting called by Jonathan aimed at picking a new president of AFLPM from among the other African first ladies to succeed her.
They explained that the defendant stepped into the shoes of president of AFLPM after Turai Yar’Adua stepped down following the death of her husband and then president, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua.
The plaintiffs averted that the tenure of office of President of the Mission is three years, which is expected to elapse in July 2015 and, therefore, any attempt for the defendant to convene a meeting to elect a new president would amount to short-changing Mrs. Buhari who ought to get a chance by May 29, 2015 to participate and even contest the office of president in July 2015.
They averred that “the defendant/respondent’s intention to hold an election on May 2015 is inimical to the progress and development of the country” as “not only shall we be affected as individuals but the entire nation will be affected as our position in the committee of African nation’s will be relegated”.

Nigeria Has Redeemed Its Image, Says Tony Blair

Former British prime minister, Mr Tony Blair, has said that Nigeria has regained its image before the international community following a successful general election that returned Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd) as president-elect, Hausa service of the BBC reports.

Mr Blair stated this during a congratulatory visit to President-elect Buhari on his recent victory at the general elections in Abuja.
According to the former prime minister, the incoming administration has greater challenges ahead but with support of fellow Nigerians, it can overcome them.

He urged the incoming government to remain resolute in its determination for a better Nigeria, and expressed optimism that Nigeria would be able to overcome its security challenges if the kind of effort put into achieving a credible election was also deployed in tackling the insecurity.
Mr Blair pledged support from the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom, noting that the lost glory of the country would be restored in a short while if the incoming government pursued its avowed goals.